" Emmaculate confirms Quailty, Timeliness and Deliverability by ensuring that the methodology it uses for development, precises on each and every artifact on the eventual roll out for a project or an assigment. The vision based techniques, we adopt gives us in depth knowledge of the subject at the core, where processes actually drive the agenda. We ensure human friendliness for our pratices involved for assignments, that are critical to the highest level. Our appraoch has thus matured within our methodology to engage best of solutions, most peculiar in nature.

However, for your facilitation and a more clear understanding, we have outlined for you an overview of our management methodology, though as a standard Emmaculate evolves Rational Unified Process to detail into relevant artifacts, depending on the nature of the project."

 

 

Development Methodologies provide a consistent way of managing execution of information systems, with uniform terminologies and expectations for all project participants. Hence, reducing the learning curve, for the new inductions into an on-going project, and also serves as a roadmap for both experienced and inexperienced staff. The simplification in the development process comes from the re-utilization of the clearly the defined products and tasks. Sequencing of tasks and the completion of deliverables, have been proven timely, thereby ensuring clarity and certainty to the process. Finally, confirming the lack of loopholes and tasks, not being duplicated. Along with structure, we also provide the criteria for tailoring alternatives to the standard approaches. The framework allows us to adopt a variety of techniques and tools for carrying out the defined tasks. It also allows us to change techniques and/or tools as new products come onto the market without changing our standard methodology adaptation.

We provide a comfort zone for information users, and define expectations both in terms of what each step will be, as well as the role they will have in that step. It is important to note that our standard practice of RUP is revised for its artifacts on project to project basis. It is not considered set in stone, but acts as a guideline and is used in accordance to the needs of the current project. Our focus remains to document before the improvement in a process is initiated. This demonstrates that we have a documented process for building software, and bringing out a change and configuration management process in a more effective manner.

 
Copyrights © 2000 - 2005 Emmaculate